Exactly one month ago I wrote about Google Code hosting. At the time I wasn’t ready to divulge the project I was using to test it, but today’s different. Today, I have decided to put BattleTop in Beta!
BattleTop is a responsive single-page web application to assist in bookkeeping things like Characters, Initiative, Hit Points, Conditions, et cetera, during D20-based table top RPG sessions.
You can view it, clone it, and provide pull requests for it at Google Code. Mind you, it is still in beta, meaning there’s many rough edges and bugs to be found. I have been and will be dogfooding it during our own table top RPG sessions, so I’ll be sharing your frustrations about bugs and time permitting I will be fixing things.
The current list of features:
Track characters. Add and remove monsters, NPCs, PCs, and environment initiatives. You can also reset the list to the party, or to a blank, new list.
Track initiative. Keep initiative and initiative modifiers, sort the list by initiative, keep track of ready and delay actions.
Track conditions. Each character has its own list of conditions which you can add, remove or change, with a number of turns to it (so they wear off automatically).
Track hit points. Each character optionally has a number of hit points. You can deal damage or apply healing to change the hit point amount.
Save/Load. Using the LocalStorage API BattleTop will save your state every 5 seconds. If you navigate away or re-open the page on your next play session the old state will be there.
Note: because BattleTop extensively uses many modern features (html5 semantic markup, css3 features, modern JS such as LocalStorage), only modern browsers will be supported.
Here’s a general view of what it currently looks like:
The horrifying state of free Android initiative-keeping apps was what triggered me to create BattleTop. I’ve decided on a HTML5 app as opposed to a native app because (a) it would be easier for me to create something in a short amount of time, and (b) to keep it portable across devices and operating systems with little effort. Hopefully BattleTop will help or inspire others as well.
In my previous post I ranted about the way the design community seems to violate the DRY principle. Let’s revisit the code (and Repeat the code, I know, I know):
font-size:1.5em;/* 24px / 16px */
What’s going on here? Well, to get to our beloved Em measurements, we apparently need a calculation based on our body’s font-size (24px) and the h1 target font-size (16px). This “would make future adjustments much, much easier”.
It’s not that I dislike this really, but more that I despise (having to do) this. We’re saying “1.5em” here, only we’re doing it twice.
Last week I’ve tried one of the solutions to this: SASS. And let me say, this feels like it could be love at first sight! With SASS, the above snippet will quickly transform into the following:
Much better, no? We’ve now only stated once what the font-size should be: a certain fraction × 1em. I’m a little bit disappointed about needing the “* 1em” there, but hey: it’s a great reason to ask another Stack Overflow question.
Anyways, SASS doesn’t stop here. It will add more improvements, one of particular importance to the above snippet. Consider this:
What’s up with the additional lines of code? Isn’t that extra code bloat? Well no, those lines help us achieve two very important goals:
Our calculation is now much more meaningful, and will now truly “make future adjustments much, much easier”.
We can reuse those variables in our style sheets. In the somewhat contrived example above it doesn’t really shine, but you can surely imagine this is a great benefit to the entire style sheet.
For my current pet project I’ve tried SASS in a feature branch, but I’ve already closed that branch: it was merged into the main branch after only a few hours. With this I’m indeed implying there’s a very friendly learning curve for SASS.
And yes: I’m also implying that you should try it for yourself! There’s many more nice features I haven’t even mentioned yet. And if I didn’t convince you, perhaps the two-page tutorial will!
My wife called me out for looking at CSS through a pair of Programmer’s Glasses™. She hastily added this could well be a Good Thing, and I suppose I’ll just interpret it as a compliment. In fact, I must say I agree, feeling more like a “developer” than a “designer”.
I usually put the math behind my measurements in a comment to the right-hand side of the line, which makes future adjustments much, much easier for me to make.
At first glance, this makes sense. However, in the long run, this feels really weird to me: it smells like code duplication. The actual result and the calculation in the comment both express the “what“, just in different form. It reminded me of Clean Code, where a whole chapter is dedicated to comments, and I’d think this would fall under the Bad Comments section (“Noisy Comment”, perhaps?).
Now I’m currently thinking I must be wrong: everyone who is something in responsive design is generating this type of sample code. Maybe it is because I should read this kind of code like:
font-size:1.5em;/* Form 1 */
/* font-size: (24px / 16px)em; *//* Form 2 */
Both forms describe what the font-size should be. Form 2 is probably “best” from a Clean Code point of view (as it’s most descriptive), but unfortunately only form 1 is valid (plain) CSS. As a compromise both forms are kept.
So, what are the options for improving things? There’s at least a few I can currently see:
Combine “Form 1 and 2”. Accept that you’ll need discipline to keep the measurement and comment in synch. This is what the Responsive Design community leaders seem to practice.
Just use “Form 1”. You’ll loose (or never have) the benefit of understanding your measurement.
Use a CSS pre-processor. There are Sass and LESS, the most well-known ways to introduce (among others) calculations in stylesheets.
To be honest, this list is currently my reverse order of preference. I’d love for option 4 (the CSS3 modules) to become a success. Until then, I’m bound to investigate the CSS pre-processors, because option 1 and 2 are both crappy, in my opinion.
This is a follow-up to my previous post on Hg Hosting Providers. I found that on the surface all four of them were very similar. From the four providers I investigated, CodePlex overall felt most intriguing, so I decided to start by trying out that one.
Note: I participate in another project, which I will be uploading to Bitbucket (because that’s the only one that supports small private projects at no charge), so I may be doing a follow-up on that provider too.
Sign Up and Project Creation
The CodePlex home page lures you into creating a project with a big, purple, Metro-style button:
When you hit the button you’ll be asked to either sign in or register:
If you don’t have an account yet (like I did) you can register for one on the spot. I decided to create an account linked to my Windows Live ID:
The hardest part is the Captcha: damn those things can be a challenge! After finally completing this mini-game, it turned out CodePlex had forgotton all about my intention to “Create a Project”, and instead presented me with my personal (and very empty) project home page:
Luckily, there’s another (though less obvious) “Create a Project” link on the page. There’s only a small number of fields you have to complete:
The whole point for me was to choose Mercurial hosting, but it’s noteworthy that both TFS (which also supports SVN clients) and Git are an option too. Hit “Create” and if all goes well you’ll be directed to the brand new project’s home page:
The project has now entered the “Setup Period”. This gives you 30 days to set up the project, i.e. before you have to go live. This was in fact a welcomesurprise to me, because since this was my first time coordinating a hosted project the setup period allows me to calmly check out all the features.
Importing the Existing Repository
Keeping in mind that eventually I would be hosting the code online, I had already started with a Hg repository, committing my changes locally. There are several advantages to using version control while still flying solo, amongst others having backups and traceability.
I already suspected it wouldn’t be too hard to merge an existing repository into a new hosted project, and I even got some response to my question on Twitter, indicating it should be possible. The only thing I was worried about is that the username for commits would be “wrong”, because my computer user name “Jeroen” is different from my new CodePlex user name “jeroenheijmans”. To get everything to work I took the following steps:
A simple copy/paste back-up of the existing repository, just to be safe.
With some effort I got this Hg convert trick to work, changing the user name in commits for the existing repository to my CodePlex username.
Make a clone (a.k.a. check out) of the project repository from CodePlex to a new local folder.
Copy the existing repository over the clone from CodePlex.
Some of the hidden files in the .hg folder have to be overwritten. I double checked all files with Notepad++, and in all (my!) cases the clone’s file could be safely overwritten.
Using TortoiseHg I now pushed all the changes. In the previous step the CodePlex URL was probably lost, but that was easily remedied by entering it once more.
To be honest, in hindsight I don’t know if step 4 and 5 are really necessary. I guess you could safely try just pushing your existing repo to CodePlex: if it doesn’t work surely you’ll get an explanatory error message?
Either way, after completing the above steps my CodePlex project contained a complete history of 40+ commits, only minutes after setting up the project!
CodePlex Features Overview
After importing the source code it was time to investigate the various CodePlex features. Given the 30 day setup period I was able to check out all the features without having to worry others may see my silly mistakes. Here’s my first impression of the available features:
Home is the first thing you see if you go to the project URL (which is a nice subdomain of CodePlex: http://yourproject.codeplex.com). It mainly contains some text to explain what the project is all about, and you’re invited to edit it (with Wiki-style markup). Worked nice and easy for my simplistic purposes.
Downloads is the section where you can offer releases, which can have various properties as well as attachments such as binaries or installers. So far I’ve only created two “Planned Releases”, which worked pretty straightforward.
Documentation is Wiki-based. So far I’m headed straight for the quintessential documentation pitfall: I’ll create it once the product’s finished.
Discussions looks like a forum-based commenting area. Given that the project is one we do together with friends we may not get to use this option much.
Issue Tracker is a very basic work-item system. It contains the bare essentials, but not much more. This was a bit disappointing to be honest, I would at least have liked to have some basic formatting, but apparently that’s still a work item on CodePlex itself.
Source Code is the section where… well… you can find the source code! It shows all commits in descending order, and even though I haven’t tried it yet it also shows forks and pull requests. If you click on a commit you get to see the diffs for changed files.
People shows all the coordinators, developers and editors on the project. It’s also the place to invite your team mates to the party!
License is where you can view and change the license for your project. CodePlex allows you to choose from ten different OSI licenses. I’m leaning towards picking the BSD license, but this license stuff feels like a snake pit (with it’s own acronym: IANAL).
So far this list of features seems pretty sufficient. At least: I haven’t “missed” a feature so far.
All together I’m pleasantly surprised by how easy it was to set all this up. I’m not sure (yet) how it actually compares to the other hosting providers I considered, but so far I’m happy I chose CodePlex.
I’m fairly certain our project will be published some time soon, and when it does you can find it at bieb.codeplex.com: join the party!
Most usually, I’m a very organized person. Even before I was programming (when I was making Hero Quest maps in Q&A and WordPerfect) I would still want periodic backups of my data. Given all that, I’ve remained remarkably oblivious of Version Control for quite a long time. Here’s an overview of my VCS history:
On a coding project with friends, one of them suggested we’d use one of the DCVS systems: either Hg or Git. After a short debate (and after reading endless flamewars between the two) we decided on trying Hg. My “re-education” started with reading the HgInit tutorial by Joel Spolsky. Here’s a quote that stuck with me:
It turns out that if you’ve been using Subversion, your brain is a little bit, um, how can I say this politely? You’re brain damaged. No, that’s not polite. You need a little re-education.
True as it is.
To be honest though: I still don’t mind using SVN. At work we have an existing repository from which we’ll probably not be switching, and it even has some advantages over Hg. However, for any new project I would choose a DCVS, either Git or Hg, depending on the circumstances.
So for my latest pet project I’ve started a Hg repository as well. So far I’ve just been committing locally, using it as a backup and history mechanism. However, with friends and family joining on the project I will probably be moving the repository to an Open Source Hosting Provider. There’s a few that came to mind, and I’m currently considering four of them. Even though there’s a decent Wikipedia comparison article, I still decided to make my own comparison table with features I find interesting:
Hg, Git, SVN
Hg, Git, SVN, TFS
Hg, Git, SVN
Daring Fireball-based markdown
10 OS licenses available
Any OS license
Codeplex + optional Win. Live
Currently I’m leaning somewhat towards CodePlex, for no particular reason or rationale. Or perhaps I’ll end up trying them all before deciding. Either way, I’ll sleep another night on it, for now.
This weekend I decided to deep dive in a StackOverflow question on the combination of pseudo-elements and the IE8 (and lower) filters. Even though it seemed to me the question couldn’t be answered with 100% certainty, I still gave it a shot. A similar but better answer got accepted (damn you, “ScottS”!!), but that’s besides the point. The most important thing I learned from answering this question, is understanding the magic in IE (especially version 8 and below). So, for reference, here are the important links of articles that made me understand IE a bit better:
On having Layout, a piece from 2008 explaining the details and consequences of IE’s take on layout.
The kicker from all this research is that I now finally understand this remotely related line of CSS I’ve seen (and even used) a lot:
This is a CSS hack to get some versions of IE to behave nicely. So far, nothing new. However, after reading the above articles, I finally understand what it does: it forces the hidden IE property hasLayout to true. And that’s useful for quite a few cases where you’d expect things to have layout, but when they don’t by default.
Hack or not, I’m glad I understand things a wee bit more now.
My next Stack Exchange Challenge post will most likely be about the Programmers SE. One part of the challenge is to actually ask a question I have on the topic. The question I came up with (to be honest, this has been bothering me for months now) took quite some time to write down carefully. So, as I don’t have my next SE Challenge post ready yet, I decided to cross-post my question here on my blog as well.
The Question:what are the practical considerations for the syntax in class and id values?
Note that I’m not asking about the semantics, i.e. the actual words that are being used, as for example described in this blogpost. There are a lot of resources on that side of naming conventions already, in fact obscuring my search for practical information on the various syntactical bits: casing, use of interpunction (specifically the - dash), specific characters to use or avoid, etc.
To sum up the reasons I’m asking this question:
The naming restrictions on id and class don’t naturally lead to any conventions
The abundance of resources on the semantic side of naming conventions obscure searches on the syntactic considerations
I couldn’t find any authorative source on this
There wasn’t any question on SE Programmers yet on this topic
Some of the conventions I’ve considered using:
UpperCamelCase, mainly as a cross-over habit from server side coding